And I turned myself to behold wisdom, and madness, and folly: for what can the man do that cometh after the king? even that which hath been already done. Ecclesiastes 2:12 (KJV)
These verses, v12-17 seems to focus on the method of Qôheleth’s methodology itself – wisdom. And it is now compared with madness and folly; or hôlêlâh (H1947)[1] and hôlêlâh (H5531)[2]. Both words essentially mean the same thing. Gill speaks of these as ‘sufferings;’ or an inquiry of wisdom in suffering (as opposed to pleasure, v1-12). But it is important to note that the focus remains on wisdom (not on suffering); he is now asking is there any profit to wisdom? And the verse positions himself as the qualified person to ask this; that no man after the King (as resourceful as he is) cannot do what he is capable of.
Comments: Qoheleth does not seem to question the usefulness of wisdom itself. Wisdom is a useful instrument in understanding the true nature of reality; that it is absolutely unsatisfactory without its creator. (1:12-15, 2:1-11) But wisdom in itself is without any profit. (Provan, 84) By extension, this means – even in suffering, it is of no profit just as it is of no profit in pleasure. To make this claim, Qoheleth studied at great length, ‘all that happens under the sun.’ That ‘no man after him,’ – a rhetorical phrase (Seow, 134), can ever go that length of studying wisdom as he has – because of his special situation. It is quite a blessing to have the understanding of one’s own privileges and not misusing it. Qoheleth thought of others – as any good Christian would – such an interesting trait.
References:
Gill, J. (1748-63). Exposition of the Old Testament, Eccl. 2:12
Provan, I. (2001). Ecclesiastes/Song of Songs: The New Application Commentary, ZondervanSeow, C.L. (1997). Ecclesiastes, Yale University Press
Seow, C.L. (1997). Ecclesiastes, Yale University Press
[1] https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/h1947/kjv/wlc/0-1/
[2] https://www.blueletterbible.org/lexicon/h5531/kjv/wlc/0-1/